M8.3 Pesticides
Last night I had a tuna sandwich for dinner, listed below are some of the ingredients, the number pesticide residues (PR), the human health and environmental effects that can be found due to them. The information was gathered by USDA Pesticide Data Program.
Ingredient
Number of Pesticide Residues
Human Health Effect
Environmental Effect
Tomatoes
35
3
—
Known or Probable Carcinogens
12
—
Suspected Hormone Disruptors
6
—
Neurotoxins
3
—
Developmental or Reproductive Toxins
10
—
Honeybee Toxins
Hot Peppers
75
3
—
Known or Probable Carcinogens
25
—
Suspected Hormone Disruptors
16
—
Neurotoxins
7
—
Developmental or Reproductive Toxins
25
—
Honeybee Toxins
Spinach
54
7
—
Known or Probable Carcinogens
21
—
Suspected Hormone Disruptors
11
—
Neurotoxins
7
—
Developmental or Reproductive Toxins
20
—
Honeybee Toxins
Avocado
1
0
—
Known or Probable Carcinogens
0
—
Suspected Hormone Disruptors
0
—
Neurotoxins
0
—
Developmental or Reproductive Toxins
0
—
Honeybee Toxins
Per the above mentioned ingredients here are the specific PR, How often it is found and the toxicity it causes:
Ingredient
Greatest Pesticide Residue
found on ingredient
How often it is found?
Toxicity
Tomatoes
Endosulfan II
17.2%
Hormone Disruptors
Hot Peppers
Oxamyl oxime
19.7%
N/A
Spinach
Permethrin Total
51.9%
Carcinogens, Hormone Disruptors and Bee Toxins
Avocado
Imiprothrin
1.1%
N/A
I was honestly alarmed to find so many pesticides in the food I'm eating, even more alarming was the health and environmental effects due the exposure of the ingredients to the pesticides. I understand the blight of the farmer and their reasoning for needing to use the pesticides. If they don't use the pesticide their crops get destroyed which jeopardizes their livelihood. This is a vicious cycle because the farmers are using the pesticide for their sustenance and we're consuming their produce for our nourishment but at the end of the day both farmer and consumer are victims of pesticide exposure. Agricultural research needs to be a priority and safe alternatives to pesticides should be studied and promoted. Farmers should receive incentives for utilizing pesticide alternatives and policies should be sent in place to ban toxic pesticides. Once pesticides are banned in the U.S., the companies that produce them shouldn't be allowed to produce or distribute them outside of the U.S. either. And if these companies continue to produce and distribute these banned products heavy fines and criminal charges should be applied against them for causing human and environmental endangerment.
Ingredient
|
Number of Pesticide Residues
|
Human Health Effect
|
Environmental Effect
|
|||||||||||||||
Tomatoes
|
35
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Hot Peppers
|
75
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Spinach
|
54
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Avocado
|
1
|
|
|
Ingredient
|
Greatest Pesticide Residue
found on ingredient
|
How often it is found?
|
Toxicity
|
Tomatoes
|
Endosulfan II
|
17.2%
|
Hormone Disruptors
|
Hot Peppers
|
Oxamyl oxime
|
19.7%
|
N/A
|
Spinach
|
Permethrin Total
|
51.9%
|
Carcinogens, Hormone Disruptors and Bee Toxins
|
Avocado
|
Imiprothrin
|
1.1%
|
N/A
|
I was honestly alarmed to find so many pesticides in the food I'm eating, even more alarming was the health and environmental effects due the exposure of the ingredients to the pesticides. I understand the blight of the farmer and their reasoning for needing to use the pesticides. If they don't use the pesticide their crops get destroyed which jeopardizes their livelihood. This is a vicious cycle because the farmers are using the pesticide for their sustenance and we're consuming their produce for our nourishment but at the end of the day both farmer and consumer are victims of pesticide exposure. Agricultural research needs to be a priority and safe alternatives to pesticides should be studied and promoted. Farmers should receive incentives for utilizing pesticide alternatives and policies should be sent in place to ban toxic pesticides. Once pesticides are banned in the U.S., the companies that produce them shouldn't be allowed to produce or distribute them outside of the U.S. either. And if these companies continue to produce and distribute these banned products heavy fines and criminal charges should be applied against them for causing human and environmental endangerment.

H Claudia,
ReplyDeleteI appreciate the last statement you make in your post, suggesting that once a pesticide is banned in the U.S., there should be strict regulations that enforce that ban and extend it tp other countries. My lit review was on DDT and although it was banned in the United States in the 70's, it's still being used as a vector-controlling insecticide in other countries. One example is Africa, where they still use DDT for indoor residual spraying to prevent malaria. I believe that if we invested in green chemistry, we could find safe alternatives to these products, instead of completely banning them and replacing them with equally harmful substances.
Hi Claudia,
ReplyDeleteI agree that farmers should receive incentives for using pesticides substitutes. It’s very easy for us to say that farmers should refrain from using pesticides but when it comes to it, a lot of our food we like is grown with pesticides. Therefore, I think substitutes are a great option.